Washington State Supreme Court Guts Local Ballot Initiative Process
by: CELDF.org Posted on: March 01, 2016
Editor’s Note: In recent years, citizens’ law making power through local and state ballot initiative processes has been on the receiving end of numerous attacks across the country. Increasingly, states’ preemption of local employer, fracking and other laws has been used as an excuse to refuse local citizens’ power to even propose local ballot measures. This is unprecedented. Local citizens are told by courts that because their local government technically does not have authority over minimum wage, fracking or employer law, for example, they—the local citizens—are not allowed to even vote on a related citizen ballot initiative. The success of this legal argument however is precarious, as it flies in the face of established legal doctrine that holds that the legality of ballot initiatives be determined after citizens vote. State ballot initiative processes are also under attack, but that story will have to wait.
In Washington State, a battle over the local initiative process has been brewing for years. Spokane residents’ efforts to place “Community Bill of Rights” on their ballot have received repeated challenges, culminating in a February, 2016 Washington State Supreme Court decision that will have far-reaching implications for the local initiative process across the state. The following is a statement by the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF) in response to the decision. CELDF is the law firm that represented the Spokane petitioners in the case. Their statement details the history and significance of the WA Supreme Court’s decision and hints at other places where the firm—which assists local governments in drafting and defending “Community Bills of Rights”—has encountered similar attacks to the local initiative process.
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON: On February 4, 2016, nearly three years after the Spokane “Community Bill of Rights” citizen initiative qualified for the ballot, the Washington State Supreme Court ruled that the interests of corporations outweigh the democratic authority of the people of Spokane to vote on the measure.
The high court’s decision reversed a 2015 appeals court ruling, which reinstated the Community Bill of Rights to the ballot. This ruling – for corporations and against direct democracy – adds to a growing pattern across the country of corporate interference into not just how we vote, but whether we can vote at all.
In 2011, a nearly identical version of the Community Bill of Rights was qualified for the ballot in Spokane. It very narrowly missed being adopted by voters. Corporations sued to prevent voters from having another opportunity to vote on the initiative, acknowledging that if the people of Spokane voted again on the Community Bill of Rights that it would pass. They used this as justification to take legal action.
The Washington State Supreme Court ruled that the interests of corporations outweigh the democratic authority of the people of Spokane to vote on the measure.
The Community Bill of Rights would have secured rights for residents to be the decision-maker over large development, greater protections for the Spokane River and aquifer, and free speech rights for workers. As well, it would have limited corporate “rights” when they conflicted with community rights.
This latest denial of the right to vote follows on the heels of an Ohio Supreme Court decision last year, which blocked people from voting on three county-level community rights initiatives, all focused on the oil and gas industry. These rulings in Washington and Ohio come as part of a growing effort by corporations across the U.S. – from Oregon to Colorado, to California, Pennsylvania, and other states – to stop communities from advancing local rights through the initiative process.
Over the past three years in Oregon, corporations have interfered with the citizen initiative, to prevent community members from even beginning the process of qualifying measures for the ballot. Industry in Oregon is now attempting to manufacture new judicial rulings that would quash any use of the people’s “direct democracy” authority to rein in corporate power.
In Oregon, communities are seeking to use their direct democracy authority – whereby they can directly propose and enact law through the citizen initiative process – to address corporate practices such as GMOs and pesticide spraying, as well as fossil fuel shipments.
In Washington State, the Supreme Court’s recent decision ultimately echoed the original trial court’s decision to block the people of Spokane from voting on the Community Bill of Rights initiative. In its decision, the Court agreed with the corporate plaintiffs that the measure would cause them “harm” by, for example, having to undergo an additional zoning review for large development. In the words of the Court, the corporate plaintiffs would experience injury in such cases, “Regardless of whether these harms might be justified or offset by other societal benefits.”
In addition, the ruling rested on the substance of the initiative, saying that it exceeded both what an initiative can bring forward, as well as what the local government could enforce. The Court’s decision goes against 100 years of judicial precedent, where the courts have restrained themselves on questions of legality or constitutionality until after a measure is voted on and adopted by the people.
The ruling supersedes the right of the people to make law that controls corporate behavior.
“The court made a political ruling not a judicial one,” said Brad Read, president of Envision Spokane, proponents of the Community Bill of Rights. “With this decision the Court has declared open season on any community in Washington that challenges corporate power.” Read further explained, “It’s plain and simple, the corporations and the courts have violated our right to local community self-government, and it’s from this ground that community rights will continue here in Spokane.”
Envision Spokane filed a motion to reconsider with the Washington Supreme Court on February 24th. The brief asserts that the Court’s decision violates the people’s right of local community self-government. There is no set date for a reply from the Court.
Photo: Wikimedia Commons
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Articles On PRESS
- Jun 13 The Fight For Local Democracy in New York City
- May 25 Crown Heights Tenant Union: Building Power One Building at a Time in NYC
- May 25 Activists Occupy Shipping Container to Halt AIM Pipeline Construction in Upstate NY
- May 25 Barrington, NH votes 795 to 759 to Adopt Community Bill of Rights to Protect Waterways
- May 25 Revoking The Consent to be Governed
- Apr 25 Announcement of Nationally Coordinated Prisoner Workstoppage for Sept 9, 2016
- Apr 19 The Spirit of Occupy Lives on in France’s Emerging Direct Democracy Movement
- Apr 19 How Sanders Could Lay the Foundation for a Third US Political Party
- Apr 10 Some Possible Ideas for Going Forward
- Apr 7 Reclaiming Black Land in Grafton, New York
- Apr 7 Meet the Lead Organizer Behind the Upcoming Mass Sit-Ins to get Money out of Politics
- Mar 28 Dismantling Corporate Control Isn’t a Spectator Sport: An Interview With Thomas Linzey
- Mar 16 Preempting Trump: Barnstead, NH Adopts First-In-Nation Law Protecting Against Religious Persecution
- Mar 4 This New Era Of Unrest
- Mar 1 Washington State Supreme Court Guts Local Ballot Initiative Process
- Feb 9 Debating A ‘New’ Pan-European Anti-Austerity Movement
- Feb 9 How New York Stopped A Liquefied Natural Gas Project In Its Tracks
- Jan 28 Food, Land, and Freedom
- Jan 27 One Oregon Tribe’s Fight for Federal Recognition
- Jan 20 Worker, Civil and Environmental Rights as Legal Ends: Defying Commerce’s Logic
- Jan 20 Fast-Food Workers Plan Wave Of Strikes For 2016 Primaries
- Jan 18 Greece’s Varoufakis to Launch Pan-European Progressive Movement
- Jan 6 California’s Largest Tribe Passes First-In-Nation Enforceable Ban On GM-Salmon and GMOs
- Dec 29 The Leap Manifesto
- Dec 29 “People’s Injunction” Launched to Block Canadian Pipelines
- Dec 29 How Black Lives Matter Came Back Stronger After White Supremacist Attacks
- Dec 29 Can Local Law Enforcement Be Democratized By A People’s Movement?
- Dec 9 Preempting Democracy: What’s Not Being Voted on This November Is Sinister
- Dec 9 A Bill of Rights That Puts Workers Above Corporations
- Dec 9 Government and Gas Industry Team Up Against Local Fracking Ban Initiatives in Ohio
- Dec 9 Fighting Fossils, Letting Go of Regulatory Law
- Aug 26 In Colorado, A Revolutionary New Coalition Stands for Community Rights
- Aug 26 Climate Crisis Pits Local Governments Against 19th-Century Legal Doctrine
- Aug 26 Hundreds of Communities Are Building Legal Blockades to Fight Big Carbon
- Jul 21 Will Labor Go Local?
- Jul 20 Challenging Bedrock Law: “Dillon’s Rule” in Detroit and Beyond
- Jul 19 Defining a Federalist Approach to Immigration Reform
- Jul 18 Why Are Fracking Hopefuls Suing a County in New Mexico?
- Dec 8 Finally, The Court Case We’ve All Been Waiting For
- Nov 8 Ohio and Colorado Voters Adopt Community Bills of Rights
- Nov 8 Community Rights Organizer Sets Sights on Fracking in Southern Illinois
- Nov 8 Critical Issues Deserve a Higher Standard
- Nov 7 Indigenous Peoples Experience Of Climate Change And Efforts To Adapt (Video)
- Oct 8 Naomi Klein Addresses New ‘Mega Union’
- Oct 8 Disco may be the only way to stop Monsanto (Video)
- Oct 8 (Ohio) Frack-Backers Launch Preemptive Strikes against Democracy Attempt to Block Community Bills of Rights from Voters
- Oct 8 The California Domestic Workers Bill of Rights Speaks to the Need for Wise Immigration Reform
- Oct 8 Support Local Food Rights Will Not Be Deterred by Legislature’s Blow to Democracy
- Oct 8 Economic Sovereignty At Stake
- Oct 8 Sangerville, Maine Adopts Community Bill Of Rights Ordinance to Reject Transportation and Distribution Corridors
- Oct 8 Sacred Headwaters
- Oct 8 Oregon Communities Launch Statewide Network for Community Rights
- Sep 8 Bowling Green, OH Group Submits Bill of Rights Petition
- Sep 8 Judgment Day
- Sep 8 Judge Blocks Envision, SMAC Initiatives from Appearing on Ballot
- Sep 8 Why a Rights Based Ordinance In Nottingham, NH?
- Aug 8 What is the Local Food System Ordinance of Lane County?
- Aug 8 Lane County Initiative to Protect Local Farming Encounters Hurdle; Campaign Still Targeting May 2014 Election
- Aug 8 Benin: Local Knowledge And Adaptation To Climate Change In Ouémé Valley, Benin
- Aug 8 Local Food System Ordinance of Lane County, Oregon
- Jul 8 Envision Spokane Statement to Legal Action to Block the Community Bill of Rights from the Ballot
- Jul 8 Why does the Spokane City Council continue to ignore and distort the substance of the Spokane Community Bill of Rights?
- Jul 8 History of Efforts to Keep the Spokane Community Bill of Rights Initiative off the Ballot
- Jul 8 East Boulder County United Launches Campaign for the Lafayette Community Rights Act to Prohibit New Oil and Gas Extraction
- Jul 8 Benton County Community Group Files Petition for the Right to a Local, Sustainable Food System
- Jul 8 Rivers and Natural Ecosystems as Rights Bearing Subjects
- Jun 8 Caring for Home through Nature’s Rights
- Jun 8 From Field to Table: Rights for Workers in the Food Supply Chain
- Jun 8 Will Ohio Be Fracking’s Radioactive Dumping Ground?
- May 7 First County in U.S. Bans Fracking and all Hydrocarbon Extraction – Mora County, NM
- May 7 Self-Replication at Stake in Monsanto Patented Seed Case
- May 7 Guatemala: Mayan K’iché Environmental Sustainability As A Way Of Life
- May 7 Small Farms Fight Back: Food And Community Self-Governance
- May 7 State College Borough Gov Denies Pipeline Permit: Fight Isn’t Over
- May 7 Muzzling Scientists is an Assault on Democracy
- Apr 8 An Addition to the Climate Movement-Civil Disobedience Toolkit
- Apr 2 Thornton, New Hampshire Rejects Community Bill of Rights To Ban Land Acquisition for Unsustainable Energy Systems
- Apr 2 Grafton, New Hampshire Adopts Community Bill of Rights That Bans Land Acquisition for Unsustainable Energy Systems
- Apr 2 Highland Township Adopts Community Bill of Rights That Bans Toxic Injection Wells
- Apr 2 PSU Pipeline Violates Community Bill of Rights
- Jun 26 The United States Conference of Mayors Resolves that Corporations are not Natural Persons etc.
- Apr 30 Information and Documents concerning Oregon LNG
- Mar 9 1st Annual Read the Dirt Writing Competition!
- Feb 24 Oil Sands Pipelines, here?
- Feb 23 PRESS: Genetically Engineered Animals?
- Feb 23 PRESS: The 9th Annual Skagit Human Rights Festival March 2012
- Jan 27 Bellingham Rights-Based Ordinance Proposed to Stop Coal Trains
- Jan 26 PRESS: Occupy Seattle Joins in Solidarity with United Farm Workers
- Jan 20 Planning For a Future (Original)
- Jan 8 PRESS: Associated Students of Western Washington University Adopt Resolution Opposing Cherry Point Coal Terminal